Updated for 2026 with latest specs, pricing, and expert analysis
Komatsu and Volvo are both premium construction equipment manufacturers known for innovation and reliability. While Komatsu leads in telematics and intelligent machine control, Volvo is renowned for fuel efficiency and operator comfort. This guide compares both brands across their strongest equipment categories to help you make the right investment.
| Specification | Komatsu PC210 | Volvo EC220E |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Weight | 21,600 kg | 22,200 kg |
| Engine Power | 159 hp (Komatsu SAA6D107E) | 168 hp (Volvo D6J) |
| Max Dig Depth | 6,590 mm | 6,610 mm |
| Bucket Capacity | 0.8 - 1.17 m³ | 0.8 - 1.28 m³ |
| Fuel Consumption | ~14 L/hr | ~13 L/hr |
| Technology | KOMTRAX + intelligent machine control (standard) | Dig Assist + Volvo Co-Pilot (optional) |
| Emissions | Tier 4 Final / Stage V | Tier 4 Final / Stage V |
| Hydraulic System | CLSS (Closed Center Load Sensing) | Electro-hydraulic with ECO mode |
| Cab Noise Level | 69 dB(A) | 67 dB(A) |
| Resale Value (5yr) | 45-55% | 50-60% |
This is a close race. Komatsu wins on technology — KOMTRAX telematics and intelligent machine control are standard, not expensive add-ons. Volvo wins on fuel efficiency (5-8% less fuel), operator comfort (quietest cab in class at 67 dB), and slightly better resale value in European markets. For buyers in Asia and the Middle East, Komatsu's larger regional presence gives it a practical edge. For European and African buyers, Volvo's dealer network and fuel savings make it the smarter choice.
Browse 15,000+ verified equipment listings from trusted sellers worldwide.
Browse Equipment →